Comments on: Nelson v. NASA http://hrlori.com/nelson-v-nasa/ Helping to Unravel the Complex World of Human Resources Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:45:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: lori nelson california http://hrlori.com/nelson-v-nasa/comment-page-1/#comment-28479 lori nelson california Tue, 01 Apr 2008 01:09:43 +0000 http://hrlori.com/nelson-v-nasa/#comment-28479 [...] a big Easter egg hunt in Los Angeles, California. ...http://www.whosdatedwho.com/news/?RD=004725701Nelson v. NASA HR Lori, Human Resources in CaliforniaLori Dorn attempting to unravel the complex world of california human resources. ... On Friday, [...] [...] a big Easter egg hunt in Los Angeles, California. …http://www.whosdatedwho.com/news/?RD=004725701Nelson v. NASA HR Lori, Human Resources in CaliforniaLori Dorn attempting to unravel the complex world of california human resources. … On Friday, [...]

]]> By: A Plaintiff http://hrlori.com/nelson-v-nasa/comment-page-1/#comment-28457 A Plaintiff Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:07:36 +0000 http://hrlori.com/nelson-v-nasa/#comment-28457 "Why would this be considered unconstitutional for one class of citizens (civilian) with access to sensitive areas and information and not another class of citizens (military)?" All of the plaintiffs (as well as more than 97% of employees at JPL) are in non-sensitive positions. The lawsuit does not cover people in sensitive positions. “Why would this be considered unconstitutional for one class of citizens (civilian) with access to sensitive areas and information and not another class of citizens (military)?”

All of the plaintiffs (as well as more than 97% of employees at JPL) are in non-sensitive positions. The lawsuit does not cover people in sensitive positions.

]]> By: RMSJr http://hrlori.com/nelson-v-nasa/comment-page-1/#comment-28382 RMSJr Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:09:58 +0000 http://hrlori.com/nelson-v-nasa/#comment-28382 This process is no different than the military has used for years to determine clearance level. The only problem I see is the abrupt nature of the transition, if it was in deed abrupt. Why would this be considered unconstitutional for one class of citizens (civilian) with access to sensitive areas and information and not another class of citizens (military)? Some of the same suitability factors, if implemented earlier, would have prevented civilian moles in the highest reaches of the FBI. This process is no different than the military has used for years to determine clearance level. The only problem I see is the abrupt nature of the transition, if it was in deed abrupt.

Why would this be considered unconstitutional for one class of citizens (civilian) with access to sensitive areas and information and not another class of citizens (military)?

Some of the same suitability factors, if implemented earlier, would have prevented civilian moles in the highest reaches of the FBI.

]]> By: HR Wench http://hrlori.com/nelson-v-nasa/comment-page-1/#comment-28381 HR Wench Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:28:58 +0000 http://hrlori.com/nelson-v-nasa/#comment-28381 WOW! No way in heck would I sign off on that background check. I'd take my chances on unemployment thank you very much. WOW! No way in heck would I sign off on that background check. I’d take my chances on unemployment thank you very much.

]]> By: Barry http://hrlori.com/nelson-v-nasa/comment-page-1/#comment-28380 Barry Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:22:22 +0000 http://hrlori.com/nelson-v-nasa/#comment-28380 Wow, why are people so offended by a <a href="http://www.easybackgroundchecks.com" rel="nofollow">background check</a>. Isn't NASA in thier right to weed out people they feel are a threat to the company, or at least keep an eye on a one? Wow, why are people so offended by a background check. Isn’t NASA in thier right to weed out people they feel are a threat to the company, or at least keep an eye on a one?

]]>